Multifactorial retrospective analysis of pathological fracture risk and treatment strategies in unicameral bone cysts

Keywords:

Inicameral bone cyst, pathological fracture, recurrence, Capanna classification, cyst index, diaphyseal localisation, paediatric orthopaedics.


Published online: Aug 06 2026

https://doi.org/10.52628/92.2.15416

S. DURAK Y.1, KARABAK B.2, TOY S.1, TUNCER K.3

1Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkiye
2Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Erzurum City Hospital, Erzurum, Turkiye
3Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Ozel Medical Park Hospital, Istanbul, Turkiye

Abstract

Unicameral bone cysts (UBCs) are benign fluid-filled bone lesions that primarily affect children and adolescents and carry a clinically relevant risk of pathological fracture. This study explored radiological and clinical variables associated with fracture and recurrence in a histologically confirmed retrospective cohort. Seventy-two patients with histologically confirmed UBCs treated between 2010 and 2021 were retrospectively analysed. Median follow-up was 38 months (range 24-132). Primary outcomes were pathological fracture and radiological recurrence. Because only eight fractures were observed, multivariable analyses were treated as exploratory. Pathological fractures occurred in 8/72 patients (11.1%). Fracture rates were 0/46 (0%), 2/20 (10%) and 6/6 (100%) for Capanna stages 1, 2 and 3, respectively (p < 0.001). Latent cysts had a higher fracture rate than active cysts (21.4% vs 4.5%; p = 0.049). Recurrence occurred in 7/71 evaluable patients (9.9%), exclusively in the interventional group (7/23, 30.4% vs 0/48; p < 0.001). In this retrospective, histologically selected cohort, higher Capanna stage, younger age, latent activity and diaphyseal localisation were associated with fracture risk. Given the limited number of fracture events, the mixed paediatric-adult population and the selection bias inherent to histological inclusion, these findings are best interpreted as exploratory and hypothesis-generating. Overall, they may be more compatible with structured, individualised risk assessment than with a prescriptive Capanna-guided treatment algorithm.