Efficacy of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound in surgically managed lower limb fractures: a randomised controlled trial


Published online: Apr 09 2026

https://doi.org/10.52628/92.1.12938

N. MAGIDA1,2, H. MYEZWA2, W. MUDZI3, E. MUSENGE4, S. A. MOHAMED KHAN5, M. A. GRAHAM6

1 Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
2 Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
3 Postgraduate School, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa
4 Department of Statistics, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
5 Steve Biko Academic Hospital, Pretoria, South Africa
6 Department of Mathematics Education, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa

Abstract

Although there have been improvements in surgical fixation techniques, the process of fracture healing continues to pose challenges, especially for patients with additional health issues. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) has been proposed as a non-invasive method to facilitate faster bone recovery; however, its effectiveness in clinical settings remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the impact of LIPUS on the healing of lower limb fractures. A double-blinded, prospective, randomised controlled trial was conducted in two hospitals in Gauteng, South Africa. The study was approved by the University of the Witwatersrand (M150236). Ninety-four individuals aged 18 years and older with lower limb fractures were consecutively recruited and randomly assigned to either the LIPUS or control group. The intervention group underwent 20-minute LIPUS sessions every alternate day for a duration of 20 days during their hospitalisation, followed by follow-up after discharge. Callus formation, cortical bridging, fracture gap, and overall radiographic healing were evaluated at 6, 12, and 18 weeks. An intention-to- treat analysis was performed to accommodate missing radiographs and loss to follow-up. No statistically significant differences were found between the intervention and control groups concerning callus formation, cortical bridging, fracture gap, or overall healing at any assessment time. A high rate of loss to follow-up and unavailability of radiographs diminished the analysis’s power. LIPUS did not show a notable improvement in fracture healing when compared to standard care. Its clinical use may need to be reevaluated, especially in low– and middle-income countries, where cost-effectiveness is a crucial factor.